How far should someone go to make compromises to get where
you want to be?
With compromises I mean, in my case, adjusting my work so
people understand it, galleries can sell it, etc.
There are a lot of variables, especially with sculptures. Sculptures
tent to be less common and most exhibitions, galleries, pubs etc. haven’t got
the facilities to show them. It was more or less the reason why I made my
second skull specifically for hanging purposes. This actually turned out very
well! Besides being able to show them,
you also have to consider how easy it is to pinch them. They might have a
shelve or a table to show them, but it means they are still not mounted on the
wall like paintings.
The other more difficult compromise is how much do you water
down your initial idea and craziness to make a bridge between you and the
average viewer. Or even a jury of an art prize. If I would decide to compromise, it
actually isn’t that easy. For example, I noticed I have blind spot for how people would
view dead animals. Where I would always approach and examine every detail of every dead animal I
see, most people would probably look away at some point, I have been told. I also thought everybody loves to have a skull hanging in their house, but apparently
I am wrong. It doesn’t stop me making them, I just have better expectations
about peoples view upon them.
I always try to keep making what I like and make more of
that part of my sculpture range that are more understandable or more practical
for showing.
The hardest bit is getting your work viewed, considered and
chosen by curators and juries of art prizes. I have no clue what the average
art expert would like about my work, mainly because I don’t know anybody in
art. I started this by myself and developed a sort of creative island around
me. I often hear that a lot of people talked about my
work during an exhibition and I consider that a good thing, but I still don’t really know why. If
this is a positive reason, would that also help winning art prizes? Could well
be that the general public has a different opinion from art experts. Also, a
lot of very well known artists weren’t understood for many years before they
were labeled as a genius. Uhum.....
It all comes down to having confidence and a fighting spirit
if you have something unique. Even if you, in my case, no clue whether I have
something different, special or uniquely rubbish maybe. In every profession, the future genius would
have been seen as a outlier, weirdo, freak, in the past, but kept going until people
started to understand and saw the difference they were making. Any compromise
would make the difference less significant. So, how motivated am I?
One thing I do know, Wile E Coyote is my example; never
gives up, always has a plan, many lives and considers himself a genius with regular self doubt. Let’s
hope I have better luck!
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten